What is the Purpose of this Site - My personal opinion?

by jst2laws 112 Replies latest jw friends

  • Dansk
    Dansk

    Grace,

    Some are SICK of my relationship with Jesus. & have told me so.

    As you know, I no longer believe in Jesus as being the son of God or even in the Bible as being the infallible word of God - but I would defend you to the hilt for your right to believe such! The main thing here is that, generally, we've all suffered in some way at the hands of the Borg and, therefore, we have personal experiences that could and often are used to help others. Grace, your words of comfort have always inspired me and kept me upbuilt. If you want to send me Jesus' or God's blessings along the way I'll gladly accept them.

    Love,

    Ian

  • mouthy
    mouthy

    Sex can be discussed if done in a manner that is suitable for let's say, younger people.

    OH well I guess That leaves me out!!!!!!

  • mouthy
    mouthy

    Dansk...What a nice response for me to wake up to.Thank you my love- your the second one this a.m. I received a p.m this a.m with a person wishing me well.( thanks Nell.dont think I know you!
    So good to see you here ...Dansk -keep us informed of the "Family affair: I am hoping you will all be together very soon.(((((((HUG))))Love you & the Mrs..... muchly

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine
    I said "spirited" discussions. If they have a firm point of view, and they are discussing a topic, then I think they should stand aside as a mod ON THAT TOPIC only. That leaves plenty of other mods to keep the peace. Stopping some discussion mid flight could be seen as wrong if you were taking part in that discussion.

    Exactly.

    I think anyone can see the wisdom in that.

    Pesonally, having been there, done that, I know that while I used to censor myself (by just not commenting on alot of things) when I was a moderator at another site, looking back at my postings and moderating, I still am a bit ashamed. I should have done better at staying behind the scenes.

  • fearnotruth22
    fearnotruth22

    I agree with Simon. It is the fair thing to do to that someone that represents Policy of the administration, when he sees a need, reminds posters, or make any ajustments needed relating tothe intended purpose of this board, to protect the mebers and guide so that things do not go to any extreme, howver, it is only just that it is donre with fairness and not imposing his personal views on others.But if the borad becomes a police station, it will be very dull if people are not allowed to say waht they feel but can only say what they arelimited to.

  • waiting
    waiting
    I hope the mods and Simon take strong note of Mouthy's initial reaction, even though it seems to be smoothed over. Think about why she had that reaction in the first place.
    If you spent any time on the real witness boards that tried to allow for as much discussion as possible, you know that witnesses don't necessarily shy away from arguments or controversy. In fact, I think the genius of Obed at witnet, was that he realized that even with real witnesses moderating and administrating his site, if you let people talk, they will talk themselves out of the "truth". Now "witnet" was heavily moderated, but compared to other witness sites it wasn't. It had to be heavily moderated, to keep out apostates. We have no such thing as apostates here, and this place should never begin stifling discussion to the extent even the most liberal *witness* site did.
    I gotta tell you, it's kinda heading that way.
    I know that when I first made the jump from a real witness discussion board (witnet) onto an apostate board (h20), it wasn't the cursing or the fighting that I censured myself from, it was atheism. LOL, yep, godless Six would not cotton to them horrible atheist. Of course, as time went on, it became clear that they were having the more interesting discussions, so I would take a peek. The point being, that a curious person will pick and choose what they will or will not read. You think they'll scurry back to the KH if they see an arguement? Hell no they won't. People are people, and people love train wrecks.
    The point being, moderate the moderation back a notch or two. The nice thing is that your job will be easier. Get rid of the list of rules, since you won't and can't and shouldn't enforce them evenly. Replace the rules with a statement about your vision for this place, and only use mods that demonstrate that they can effect a similar vision, Simon. I think Seven leads the way, even if just by her absence, lol. It doesn't mean you have to allow unlimited outright meanness and shit-stirring, but even exiting witnesses have VERY strong feelings about free speech, maybe even more so than the rest of the world in general.
    And moderaters, for god's sake, recuse yourself from any thread on which you express any opinion whatsoever.
    You just can't have it both ways. *smacks row of mods heads like a marx brothers movie*
    I well know that the situation is complicated at this time, with every move a mod makes being disected by a gallery and some people and animals playing to that gallery. Let them rot in the hell of their own anti-social construct. - six

    Thank you, Six - a great post worth repeating, but without editing. (btw, one post, but couldn't get the quote thingie to comply.)

    I haven't seen people using their moderator permissions to win an argument, that would be wrong, but if discussions develop into an argument or start containing insults then they can do something about it which is why they are there. - simon

    Amazing did just that - he started a thread to specifically challenge IslandWoman about Ray Franz - and he said he would lock that same thread if if got out of hand in his opinion. A moderator who argues, then threatens to lock the thread when he deems it gets out of hand is not moderating - he's participating, using his moderator's credentials for clout.

    I said "spirited" discussions. If they have a firm point of view, and they are discussing a topic, then I think they should stand aside as a mod ON THAT TOPIC only. That leaves plenty of other mods to keep the peace. Stopping some discussion mid flight could be seen as wrong if you were taking part in that discussion. -smack

    Well said. Btw, Amazing didn't close the above referenced thread - another mod did. IslandWoman wasn't the argumentitive poster - neither was I, imho. Hell, if I were a mod, I would have closed it down as soon as Amazing posted....lol - I disagree with him on that issue.

    And that's why I'm not a moderator. Btw, slightly joking about my moderating skills, or lack thereof (always need to add disclaimer for humor impaired posters.)

    Many good opinions on this thread. Thank you.

    waiting

  • shamus
    shamus

    If you guys think that I'm reading through 4 pages of posts you're all freakin' nuts.

    Love, Sham

  • waiting
    waiting

    who says we're not nuts?

    The thread's worth the read.

  • jst2laws
    jst2laws

    Sorry I have been absent sence late last night, I'll try to catch up now. Stacy, You made some good points, level playing field and consistency in focusing. It is difficult to be consistent as each of us, no one excluded, has issues that we get bent out of shape about. But I will assure you we try and we correct one another. I wonder if it wouldn't be better to be more public about these shortfalls so others will not assume we view ourselves as a flawless aristocracy. Nowisee, Yes, all of them are related. I'm glad you were helped by JWD PopeOfEruke,

    "I prefer that moderators and board administrators NOT be allowed to post on topics. "

    I understand the problem. I personally would feel content that if a mod was involved in a discussion he should agree not to play moderator at the same time. On the other hand, if I start a thread I might feel like I'm responsible to make sure it does not go south and become hurtful. But for the sake of objectivity, I think in that case I should just make sure it is being covered by someone else. But this is about moderation and I said at the beginning that this is not going to be about moderation. Sorry. See how easily I loose focus? At least this seems to be productive rather than a gripe session. Thanks for your thoughts Pope, Steve

  • ApagaLaLuz
    ApagaLaLuz
    A young lady last night told me this site 'saved her life'.

    One night about a year ago I talked with a young girl in chat about 2:30 in the morning who was considering suicide. I'd like to think that I offered her a listening ear and some good advice that night.

    For me, I have been out so long now that I kinda feel like I have just moved on, though I do have an occasional relapse. For all the "sexual jokes and fights and homosexuality" that may be presented on the board, when someone post on here with a serious issue there is an abundance of help offered.

    I like this place because I can post silly "fluff." Or if something bad happens like Blowing out my knee, my dad having a stroke, or the custody issues with my nephew I get kind words and encouragement back. That is what is unique about this board, and what it means to me.

    Now if you'll excuse me, my Vicoden is kicking in.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit