hey isaacaustin, your right is is according to conscience and since my main objections to christmas is not it's pagan origins but that i think it has become worshiped i'll stand by my viewpoint, it is as you say a personal thing.
Who decides what is a gnat or a camel Reniaa? And regarding what you posted as to the pagan origin of the tree that is very debatable.
So, I again ask for a clear cut, direct answer as to where the bible clearly says to ro shows one to abstain from Christmas, or birthdays?
I have shown you Romans 14 which deals extensively with the use of one's own conscience and not to judge others based on their observance of days. This would directly seem to rule out the practice of disfellowshipping due to one's celebrating of a day.
If you want to apply the pagan origin rule you must do it blanketly and consistently- not only to what the Wt calls a bigger issue.
Like i said the bible doesn't mention christmas at all! but absence does not imply acceptance as I think your trying to prove, otherwise we could apply that to any amount of weird and wonderful things! We have principles that can be held against any given practise and use our judgement against them.
If I viewed christmas as just a day, I would agree with your next statement but I don't! I think christmas is a form of worship and gone well beyond the simple expression of just observing as a day. So beyond that I can't really comment as I don't agree with your statement.
Your last statement is interesting because of all christian faiths, I would say Jw's have tried to be consistent in applying rules and I would say get the most criticism for over-blanketing rules, and if they to get to a point were some gnats have to get through well it will happen! if I was in charge I would loosen some of the heavily applied ones but christmas wouldn't be one of them :)