jesus denies being God! scriptural discussion.

by reniaa 421 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • sacolton
    sacolton

    Great scriptures, lovelylil! Really puts the WTBTS theology in its proper place. Keep up the good work!

    Just want to add Galatians 1:8

    But even if we or an angel from heaven should proclaim to you a gospel contrary to what we proclaimed to you, let that person be condemned!

  • lovelylil
    lovelylil

    by the way Joseph,

    I would like to see in scripture where people were worshiped with no problem. Do not mixup the words "obesiance" which is bowing out of respect with the word "worship". Trust me I am going to look up any verse you give me in its original language to see what word was used.

    The WT used "obeisance" instead of "worship" in the NWT to hide that fact that Christ was God. You really should throw away that trashy bible Joseph, and you too Reniaa. No wonder you two are so mixed up.

    Lilly

  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    actually Sacolton, the WT admitted in a WT article- I can find it but need time if you want- they they do preach a different gospel than that taiught by the apostles. I believe they said more is needed...

  • lovelylil
    lovelylil

    Some facts about the NWT and the words "obeisance" and "worship" This information was taken from here; http://www.carm.org/jw/nwt_proskuneo.htm

    The New World Translation and
    "Proskuneo" (worship)

    The chart below is a list of every occurrence of the Greek word "proskuneo" that I could find in The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures (1969). This work was produced by the New World Translation Bible committee in accordance with the Watchtower organization. An interlinear is a word for word translation of the Greek text. Included in this Watchtower interlinear is the text of the New World Translation Bible placed in a column on each page so the reader can see exactly how the NWT renders each occurrence of the verb "proskuneo."
    The word "proskuneo" means "to kiss the hand, bow down before, show obeisance, to worship." Since the Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Jesus is God, they maintain that He is not to be worshipped. So, how does the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society translate the word "proskuneo" in their Greek New Testament in reference to Jesus and other objects of adoration? The NWT never translates the word into "worship" when it references Jesus. It does, however, render the word as "worship" in regards to the devil, the dragon, the beast, the image, demons, idols, and an angel. Of course, they correctly translate it as "worship" when it deals with God.
    Is the New World Translation biased against worshipping Jesus? It would surely seem so, especially since the NASB, NIV, KJV, NKJV, etc., all translate the word as "worship" in reference to Jesus.
    What is curious is to note that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society used to teach that worshipping Jesus was acceptable:

    "The fact that our Lord received worship is claimed by some to be an evidence that while on earth he was God the Father disguised in a body of flesh and not really a man. Was he really worshiped, or is the translation faulty? Yes we believe our Lord Jesus while on earth was really worshiped, and properly so. While he was not the God, Jehovah, he was a God. The word ‘God’ signifies a ‘mighty one,’ and our Lord was indeed a mighty one. So it is stated in the first two verses of the gospel of John. It was proper for our Lord to receive worship in view of his having been the only begotten of the Father. . ." (The Watchtower, July 15, 1898, p. 216.)

    It seems that as the Watchtower theology changed, they needed a Bible consistent with those changes; hence, the New World Translation. Following is a chart listing every appearance of the word "proskuneo" in the New World Translation. Let's see if the bias of the Watchtower organization is obvious.
    The word "proskuneo" occurs 55 times in the Watchtower Kingdome Interlinear. Of those 55, 15 are in reference to Jesus with 40 used of others. 27% of the usage is of Jesus and not a single reference is translated as "worship" even though in reference to the devil, demons, idols, etc., they do translate it as worship. If this doesn't demonstrate their bias, then what does?

    VerseJesusGodDemonsdragon,
    beast,
    image
    DevilGenericIdolsPeterangel
    Matt. 2:2obeisance
    Matt. 2:8obeisance
    Matt. 2:11obeisance
    Matt. 4:9worship
    Matt. 4:10worship
    Matt. 8:2obeisance
    Matt. 9:18obeisance
    Matt. 14:33obeisance
    Matt. 15:25obeisance
    Matt. 18:26obeisance
    Matt. 20:20obeisance
    Matt. 28:9obeisance
    Matt. 28:17obeisance
    Mark 5:6obeisance
    Mark 15:19obeisance
    Luke 4:7worship
    Luke 4:8worship
    Luke 24:52obeisance
    VerseJesusGodDemonsdragon,
    beast,
    image
    DevilGenericIdolsPeterangel
    John 4:20worship
    John 4:21worship
    John 4:22worship
    John 4:23worship
    John 4:23 worship
    John 4:24worship
    John 9:38obeisance
    John 12:20worship
    Acts 7:43worship
    Acts 8:27worship
    Acts 10:25obeisance
    Acts 24:11worship
    1 Cor. 14:25worship
    Heb. 1:6obeisance
    Heb. 11:21worship
    VerseJesusGodDemonsdragon,
    beast,
    image
    DevilGenericIdolsPeterangel
    Rev. 3:9obeisance
    Rev. 4:10worship
    Rev. 5:14worship
    Rev. 7:11worship
    Rev. 9:20worship
    Rev. 11:1worship
    Rev. 11:16worship
    Rev. 13:4worship
    Rev. 13:8worship
    Rev. 13:12worship
    Rev. 13:15worship
    Rev. 14:7worship
    Rev. 14:9worship
    Rev. 14:11worship
    Rev. 15:4worship
    Rev. 16:2worship
    Rev. 19:4worship
    Rev. 19:10worship
    Rev. 19:20worship
    Rev. 20:4worship
    Rev. 22:8worship
    Rev. 22:9worship

    As you can see, the NWT is very bias in how it translates the word "proskuneo." Whenever it is in reference to Jesus, they absolutely will not let it be translated as worship. Why? Because they erringly deny that Jesus is God in flesh and their Bible reflects their bias. This is not how proper theology is done.
    The Watchtower Organization has changed the Bible to suit its needs.
  • isaacaustin
    isaacaustin

    and even if you want to use the word obeisance please refer to the verse up above I posted in Acts...and ask yourself how Peter reacted when receiving, as the NWT puts it...obeisance....The NWT translates Cornelius bowing down to Peter as obeisance and Peter still tells him not to do this as he is just a man.

  • sacolton
    sacolton

    That's a pretty open and shut case the proves the WTBTS wanting to steer people away from Jesus thus losing their salvation.

  • Slappy
    Slappy

    Slappy and StAnn,

    I think you two are going to convert me to full trinitarian yet.

    The Spirit leads as the Spirit wills, I claim nothing.

    In truth, I wasn't sure of the importance of understanding the idea of the Trinity myself. However, as a result of this topic and having to look a little deeper into God's Word, I am beginning to see that such a relationship is not only possible, but quite possibly necessary.

    slappy

  • Deputy Dog
    Deputy Dog

    reniaa

    I have an honest question for you.

    In the book of John Chapter 6 Jesus calls himself "the bread that came down from heaven"

    John 6:31 Our forefathers ate the manna in the wilderness, just as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" 32 Hence Jesus said to them: "Most truly I say to YOU, Moses did not give YOU the bread from heaven, but my Father does give YOU the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the one who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." 34 Therefore they said to him: "Lord, always give us this bread." 35 Jesus said to them: "I am the bread of life. He that comes to me will not get hungry at all, and he that exercises faith in me will never get thirsty at all. 36 But I have said to YOU, YOU have even seen me and yet do not believe. 37 Everything the Father gives me will come to me, and the one that comes to me I will by no means drive away; 38 because I have come down from heaven to do, not my will, but the will of him that sent me. 39 This is the will of him that sent me, that I should lose nothing out of all that he has given me but that I should resurrect it at the last day. 40 For this is the will of my Father, that everyone that beholds the Son and exercises faith in him should have everlasting life, and I will resurrect him at the last day." 41 Therefore the Jews began to murmur at him because he said: "I am the bread that came down from heaven"; 42 and they began saying: "Is this not Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it that now he says, 'I have come down from heaven'?" 43 In answer Jesus said to them: "Stop murmuring among yourselves. 44 No man can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him; and I will resurrect him in the last day. 45 It is written in the Prophets, 'And they will all be taught by Jehovah.' Everyone that has heard from the Father and has learned comes to me. 46 Not that any man has seen the Father, except he who is from God; this one has seen the Father. 47 Most truly I say to YOU, He that believes has everlasting life. 48"I am the bread of life. 49 YOUR forefathers ate the manna in the wilderness and yet died. 50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that anyone may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven; if anyone eats of this bread he will live forever; and, for a fact, the bread that I shall give is my flesh in behalf of the life of the world."

    If Jesus was just a man, what came down from heaven?

  • cameo-d
    cameo-d
    44 No man can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him; and I will resurrect him in the last day.

    Looks to me like god is not your choosing him, but rather him choosing you.

    Maybe this is why some people can never understand the meaning of the scriptures and will always follow traditions of men.

  • reniaa
    reniaa

    So despite never mentioning he is God and obeiance/worship been a word all through the bible given to kings, appostles, moses and yes jesus etc, you think you can say that people doing this to jesus proves he is God?

    The sheer amount it is used really shoots your saying 'whole jesus must be God if he lets people worship him.'in the foot

    I have through reading like slappy come to a greater understanding of the trinity, unlike slappy it has made me even more sceptical of it,

    The constant reminders that they are 3 separate beings means that God is lying in OT when he says he is one God. All jews/muslims know that this is none negotiable, and they in this respect haven't changed from before Jesus, Jesus was a jew that believed in One God, why make it a commandment only to change it?

    God a not a title to be shared between 3 separate beings it is the Supreme being it describes what God is!, Did all 3 appear magically at the same time as separate people or if jesus did appear second can God just say you are God to Jesus and make it so? think on this! The bible is not trying to make us believe in the trinity it is trying to show us the relationship between Father and son. Also remember the bible isn't written for scholars its written for average joe to understand and he would walk away going 'OOoh Jesus is Gods son!" The bible God's inspired word is telling us what the nearest definition to jesus's and jehovah's relationship is, Believe it!.

    If your have to argue special circumstances to make certain words come to different conclusions then you really need to relook at your conclusions...

    Renia

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit