I think it was me who first raise the matter of ‘acts of God’ when I broke free from my chain and posted on page 16 - “For example let’s just look at the destruction and death caused so called ‘by acts of God.’ Earth quakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis.”
Several people have commented since and given the impression that I see these occurrences as acts of God. I don’t. That is why I prefixed my comment with “so called.” The term acts of God simply means that no human agency is responsible. They are unpreventable natural occurrences.
To believe them to really be acts of God, I would have to believe in an all powerful God. I don’t blame a non-existent God for anything or ask it for anything, nor can I be angry with a non-existent God. Sorry to repeat the same thing but as that’s what everyone else does, I didn’t want to be left out.
By the way, in regard to the question posed by this thread:
"Still, no matter which numbers you use, doesn't this make you arrive at one of the following conclusions?
1- God is evil.
2- God cannot or will not hear and answer prayers.
3- An omnipotent god simply does not exist."
Can someone tell me what the verdict is?