Romney Tells Millionaire Donors What He REALLY Thinks of Obama Voters

by darth frosty 553 Replies latest members politics

  • botchtowersociety
    botchtowersociety

    There's nothing fundamentally wrong with his statement. Other than maybe the actual percentages, it is accurate, and this video will help him with his base. As for telling millionaire donors what he really thinks.....

    ......I'd like to know what the Romney attackers think of this Obama comment wherein he describes white blue collar voters as xenophobic bitter clingers:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-no-surprise-that-ha_b_96188.html

    You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them," Obama said. "And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

    Obama made a problematic judgment call in trying to explain working class culture to a much wealthier audience. He described blue collar Pennsylvanians with a series of what in the eyes of Californians might be considered pure negatives: guns, clinging to religion, antipathy, xenophobia.

    And what about writing off much of the country?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2067223/President-Obamas-2012-campaign-abandons-white-working-class-voters-favor-minorities-educated.html

    Obama campaign abandons white working-class voters in favor of minorities and the educated President Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign will be the first in modern political history to abandon white working-class voters, strategists claim.

    For decades, Democrats have been losing more and more blue collar whites. Their alienation helped lead to the massive Republican wave in 2010, when the GOP wooed 30 percent more of them than the Democrats could. Democratic strategists say President Obama is focusing his attention, instead, on poor black and Hispanic voters and educated white professionals...

    'All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment... and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic,' longtime political reporter Thomas B. Edsall wrote in an opinion piece in the New York Times... 'The 2012 approach treats white voters without college degrees as an unattainable cohort,' he writes later.

    the fact there are consulting firms from foreign countries working in OUR ELECTIONS is scary.
    LOL, he also outsources his campaign jobs.

    Uhmmmm. Maybe you two should go back and re-read what he actually said.

  • designs
    designs

    Not nearly as damning or snobbish as Romney's comment and many of the white working class did in fact vote for Obama because he offered a better choice than Senator McCain offered.

  • Stealth
    Stealth

    As a middle class voter who paid a higher precent of income tax than Mitt Romney and took no hand outs from the governement, I am insulted.

    I won't be voting for duchbag Mitt Romney!

  • Berengaria
  • Berengaria
    Berengaria

    LOL Burn.

    Obama was actually being kind and generous in explaining the frustrations of those who have fallen through the cracks for decades.

    As for what pundits and reporters say about the focus of the campaign, who cares? Proposed policy tells a different story.

  • BizzyBee
    BizzyBee

    practically at the level of a high school jock trying to convince the other guys on the team that the new kid isn't fit to join the team

    Or how about a private school jock trying to convince the other guys that the kid with long hair needs to be assaulted with a pair of scissors and get his hair cut? Because

    “he can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!”

    Same guy, different decade.

  • Jaime l de Aragon
  • BizzyBee
    BizzyBee

    Hey, at least it got everyone's mind off his Benghazi screw-up. Which had gotten our minds off his Clint Eastwood/Afghanistan screw-up. Which had gotten our minds off Ann's "you people" screw-up.

    Maybe this is his new strategy?

  • rather be in hades
    rather be in hades
    Uhmmmm. Maybe you two should go back and re-read what he actually said.

    i did...perhaps you should actually watch the videos and get your fingers out your ears?

    edit:

    i can understand being anticom/antisocialist. i am as well.

    despite everything that the right wing says, if you take a step back and look objectively, obama is definitely NOT a communist or socialist. not quite sure why he freaks you out like he does, but at some point, you have to face reality about romney. he's crossed the line from:

    "we shouldn't even give him the keys to the city, much less the nuclear arsenal and the rest of the country"

    there is nothing wrong with well written regulations. we have regulations that make sure no one dumps toxic chemicals into streams and lakes. if you honestly think they wouldn't given the chance, then you're just ignoring reality and the history of this country.

    there's nothing wrong with regulations that make sure our food is safe to eat. the fact that "pink slime" ever came into existence just shows how badly we need to make sure we regulate business to protect consumers.

    the libertarian dream of no regulations, only a military, privatize everything is a total and complete fantasy.

    they somehow think states should just vote on whether certain rights are allowable. that's not right. that's not america. so it's supposed to be tyranny of the majority and let the market decide what civil rights we should have? what about the people whose rights have been stripped and cannot afford to simply pack up and move?

    there is a role for gov't, there is a need for regulations. no one is saying the regulations have to be burdensome, so why not fix the broken ones instead of trying to deregulate everything? that's just nonsense.

  • botchtowersociety
    botchtowersociety
    Hey, at least it got everyone's mind off his Benghazi screw-up. Which had gotten our minds off his Clint Eastwood/Afghanistan screw-up. Which had gotten our minds off Ann's "you people" screw-up.
    Maybe this is his new strategy?

    You raise an interesting point without knowing it. Romney did not appear to control the release of this video or its timing.

    For that you can thank Corn and the guy who put it together--Jimmy Carter's grandson. This piece was almost certainly intended for October. It was released now for a reason--to change the news cycle.

    Why?

    He also did not disavow it and called for the full release of its contents in a press conference yesterday.

    i did...perhaps you should actually watch the videos and get your fingers out your ears?

    RBIH: I've watched the videos. Here's what you said.

    the fact there are consulting firms from foreign countries working in OUR ELECTIONS is scary.

    He does not say he has foreign consulting firms working for his campaign. Show me where he does.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit