Suggesting I gather supporting or contrary information in relation to that assertion is a specific form of argumentum ad ignorantiam known as shifting the burden of proof.
If you have evidence to back up your claim I’m all ears. Otherwise it’ll be no more and no less than an unproven assertion.
@marvin
Firstly, I dispute your claim I made the 'without consent' statement. Now please provide evidence to your assertion that I used the words 'without consent' - the 2 words that your argument now hang on apparently.
Secondly, you won't win any friends in the peanut gallery by avoiding a reasonable request with complicated appeals to Latin logic. (feel free not to respond - just informing you)
Thirdly, I have provided evidence:
1) numerous individuals, including me and my wife, have said they were added without permission
2) the process to add without consent is much easier than seeking consent <800 people consensually added by 3 people in a matter days - really?>
3) Julia Barrick Douglas has made no effort to contact me to contradict my claim or apologise. Nor did she use her FaceBook platform to dispute my claim, merely to advocate my shunning.
Lastly, I note your obfuscation - let me know when you are ready to ask AAWA for a simple answer to a simple question.