The fact that even today with all our technology we can still have a mass unexplained event tells us that we don't know as much as we present that we know.
That is a 100% dishonest misrepresentation of science.
The reason people are still doing science is because we don't know things. The lights in the sky is proof of that. No one argues it. It, however, is in no way evidence that "we don't know" means God might be real.
All those things are not required knowledge to experience unexplained phenomenon.
This has nothing to do with unexplained phenomena. This has to do with trust in the Bible as being accurate or a good guide. It fails.
The one that the Bible, and countless other religions, focus on and worship daily since the dawn of the sentient man. But for this discussion we'll zero in on the YHWH version.
Sure. Tell me what his first cause was? What caused him? What's your theory, evidence, hypothesis? Maybe it was the lights over Phoenix.
I wont deny that much of YHWH is created in man's image, but that's not proof that YHWH isn't a manmade God based off of the real deal.
You fail at the logics, bro. This type of logic chopping and double negative use is evidence of a poorly thought out construct that could NEVER have a positive resolution.
Remember the Bible spans two mainstream religions over thousands of years. It's a powerhouse of a historical document.
No....the Bible as a collection is relatively new and was only a powerhouse recently. The early writings of the Jews didn't influence the world at large. The Bible didn't exist when the Sumerians were writing their stuff, or the egyptians, or Buddha, or the Aztecs, or the Mayans, or the people making temples 13000 years ago at Gobekli Tepe.
So, if other ancient writings contain the same ideas as the bible, are ALL inspired or none inspired?
And you badly quoted me out of context by just referencing the first paragraph and you didn't paraphrase correctly.
I didn't quote you out of context. After what I quoted you switched to the idea of the Bible having the ideas of night and day. This was a self contained idea, part a larger non-sequitur. Perhaps I didn't paraphrase correctly, probably because the giant non-sequitur didn't make much sense.